different ToT offsets, as the effect of temperature is higher on the longer
stretcher offsets due to larger intrinsic delays of the electronic components
on the delay lines. The average relative effect of the temperature on delay
-line is calculated as $\sim$1.3$\%/^{\circ}$C.
+line is calculated as $\sim$0.4$\%/^{\circ}$C.
The temperature correction coefficient is calculated iteratively until the
smallest ToT deviation among every channel at the measured temperatures is
The effect of the temperature change on the ToT measurement is also assessed and
the average relative effect of the temperature on delay line is calculated as
-$\sim$1.3$\%/^{\circ}$C. This result shows that the with the increasing length
+$\sim$0.4$\%/^{\circ}$C. This result shows that the with the increasing
+length
of the delay line and temperature difference the shift in the mean value
increases. This degeneration is corrected by a factor of $\sim$10 and limited to
$\sim$65~ps with a correction model.
can be minimised to less then 1$^{\circ}$C. Although in many high energy
physics applications high precision ToT measurements are not required, if
necessary, the conventional method should be used, as the temperature effect
-plays a minimal role.
+plays a minimal role in short routing lines.