\documentclass{JACoW-GSI-2014}
\usepackage{graphicx}
-\usepackage{tikz}
-\usetikzlibrary{shapes.geometric, arrows}
-\usepackage{pstricks}
-\usepackage{pst-node}
-\usepackage{pst-blur}
\usepackage{url}
+\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\DeclareSymbolFont{greek}{U}{eur}{m}{n}
\DeclareMathSymbol{\upmu}{\mathord}{greek}{"16}
\newcommand{\mus}{~\rm \upmu s}
\newcommand{\mum}{~\rm \upmu m}
+\newcommand{\muA}{~\rm \upmu A}
\newcommand{\neqcm}{~\rm n_{eq}/cm^2}
\newcommand{\Mrad}{~\rm Mrad}
\newcommand{\krad}{~\rm krad}
%%
%% VARIABLE HEIGHT FOR THE TITLE BOX (default 35mm)
%%
-\setlength{\titleblockheight}{33mm}
+%\setlength{\titleblockheight}{33mm}
\begin{document}
-\title{First results of FSBB sensors\thanks{This work has been supported by BMBF (05P12RFFC7), HIC for FAIR and GSI.}}
+\title{Transfer function measurement of full scale building block sensors\thanks{This work has been supported by BMBF (05P12RFFC7), HIC for FAIR and GSI.}}
\author[1]{B. Linnik}
\author[1]{D. Doering}
\author[1]{M. Deveaux}
\author[ ]{J. Stroth\textsuperscript{\normalfont 1,2} for the CBM-MVD collaboration}%\author{for the CBM-MVD collaboration}
%\affil{Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany and IPHC Strasbourg, France}
%\affil{IPHC Strasbourg, 23 Rue du Loess, 67037 Strasbourg, France}
-\affil[1]{Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany}
+\affil[1]{Institut f\"ur Kernphysik, Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany and IPHC Strasbourg, France}
\affil[2]{GSI Darmstadt, Germany}
%\affil[mun]{Forschungsneutronenquelle Heinz-Maier-Leibnitz (FRM II), Technical University Munich, Lichtenbergstr. 1,
%85747 Garching, Germany}
\maketitle
-\hbox{}
-\hbox{ }
%\section{Introduction}
+The Micro-Vertex-Detector (MVD) of the future CBM-experiment will rely on CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors (MAPS). Those sensors match so far the requirements of CBM in terms of excellent spatial resolution, ultra-light material budget and non-ionizing radiation tolerance. Intense R\&D is being carried out within a joint research program of the PICSEL group of the IPHC/Strasbourg and the IKF of the Goethe University of Frankfurt/Main in order to improve their tolerance to ionizing radiation and their read-out speed.
+
+This review will show results of measurements made at the IPHC with the FSBB-M0 sensor. Three FSBB-M0 (\textbf{F}ull \textbf{S}cale \textbf{B}uilding \textbf{B}lock for \textbf{M}ISTRAL) sensor units will compose one full sensor which will be used in the outer layers of the Inner Tracking System (ITS) of the ALICE experiment, due to the latest improvements made in radiation hardness and readout-speed of CMOS sensors. One objective is to validate the complete sensor read-out chain at real scale, so further progress in this field can be archived.
+
+The $9{.}2 \times 16.9~\rm mm^2$ big FSBB-M0 sensors are made in a $0{.}18 \mum$ process, based on a high resistivity ($~1 k\Omega cm$) epitaxial layer of $18 \mum$ thickness. The chip consists of $416 \times 416$, $22 \times 33 \mum^2$ sized pixels. The sensor has end-of-column discrimination. Two rows are read simultaneously in rolling shutter mode (200 ns per 2 rows), this is possible because each column has two discriminators. To compress the data a zero suppression logic named SUZE02 is implemented. The FSBB-M0 sensor comes in two flavors (FSBB-M0a and FSBB-M0b) and are divided in two submatrices. They differ in diode size or have different input transistor dimensions of the in-pixel pre-amplifier. For details regarding the building scheme see~\cite{TWEPP2014}.
+
+A total of 25 FSBB-M0 chips have been characterized, showing a remarkably similar temporal (pixel dispersion in time) and fixed pattern noise (spatial spread of the pixel threshold) performance. The results are presented in table~\ref{table:noise} and figure~\ref{fig:figure1}. Except for the outliers chip number 15, the new architecture based on the $0{.}18 \mum$ process has an excellent yield and a reliable behavior.
+
+\begin{table}[htbp]
+ \centering
+ \caption[noise results]{Mean temporal noise (TN) and fixed patten noise (FPN) with sigma for the tested FSBB-M0 sensors}
+ \vspace*{0.1cm}
+ \begin{tabular}{lll}
+ \hline
+ & TN [mV] & FPN [mV] \\
+ \hline
+ Big Diode & $0.94\pm 0.06$ & $0.45\pm 0.05$ \\
+ Small Diode & $0.69\pm 0.04$ & $0.73\pm 0.14$ \\
+ Big Transistor& $0.68\pm 0.04$ & $0.65\pm 0.06$ \\
+ Small Transistor&$1.07\pm 0.04$ & $0.40\pm 0.02$ \\
+ \hline
+ \end{tabular}
+ \label{table:noise}
+\end{table}
+
+
+% The benefit of the in-pixel in comparison to the column-wise discrimination is the lower power consumption ($~14 \muA$ instead of $~120 \muA$ per pixel -- the analog buffer doesn't have to drive the long distance along the column) and the faster readout times ($15 \mus$ read-out time in comparison to $30 \mus$ -- the A-D conversion can be halved due to the small local parasitic). On the other hand, the in-pixel discrimination is an innovative architecture which has to be tested and validated more, while the column wise discrimination is a mature technology, which was already successfully implemented and used in previous MIMOSA chips.
+
+%For the discrimination in the columns, .
+%A sample transfer function study is shown in \ref{fig:figure1}. Each curve discribes the fire behavior of one pixel averaged over time as a function of the reference voltage. The distribution of the slopes is called temporal noise and is shown in \ref{fig:figure2}. %The two discrimination modes, as well as different transitor sizes were tested:
+%For the discrimination in the pixel one observes a distribution with two peaks, it seems that there are two main types of pixel behavior. To investigate the fixed pattern noise, the behavior of the pixels for different threshold voltages
+
+\begin{figure}[htb]
+\begin{center}
+\includegraphics[width=0.4\textwidth]{yield}
+\end{center}
+\vspace*{-0.4cm}
+\caption{Except for the outliers chip number 15, all chips are working and have noise distribution with a low spread.}
+\label{fig:figure1}
+\end{figure}
+
\begin{thebibliography}{15}
-\bibitem{Cite:ReportDennis}
- D. Doering et al., \emph{Noise performance and radiation tolerance of CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors manufactured in a 0.18$\upmu$m CMOS process}, this report.
-%\bibitem{RESMDD2012}
-%D. Doering et al., \emph{Pitch dependence of the tolerance of CMOS monolithic active pixel sensors to non-ionizing radiation, NIM-A} (2013)
+%\bibitem{SuperPaper}
+%Mathieu Goffe, \emph{An article with a good scheme for the FSBB-M sensors} (2014)
+
+\bibitem{TWEPP2014}
+Frédéric Morel, PICSEL group, IPHC Strasbourg, talk at TWEPP 2014, contribution 107, \emph{FSBB-M and FSBB-A: Two Large Scale CMOS Pixel Sensors Building Blocks Developed for the Upgrade of the Inner Tracking System of the ALICE Experiment} (2014)
-%\bibitem{IWORID}
-% D. Doering et al. \emph{Noise performance and ionizing radiation tolerance of CMOS Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors using the $0.18\mum$ CMOS process,sent to editorial office} (2014)
\end{thebibliography}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
jspc29 / reports.git / commitdiff